Pick a side.

 

Berlin stadium photo by @warwicklanguage CC BY

Time ticks on and increasingly I am reading more about the impact of technical developments. I have written of my reading and thoughts of the endless march of the techbros on my Espace Sisyphe blog. From my sideline position as a retired teacher and educational technologist it is getting harder and harder not to take a stand and refuse to tacitly approve of the many technologies that I have, in the past, used and recommended to others. This is particularly the case as I see the dilemmas faced by current practitioners who are both asked to promote and encourage the use of technology whilst also struggling to balance concerns about wellbeing and educational values for their students. It reminds me of a biblical citation from my distant past where I was expected : "to be in the world but not of the world"

Mozilla recently shared an excellent explainer video about the changed landscape online:

So far I have focussed on expressing my critical appraisal of educational technologies, maintaining that there are certain principles I would  apply when making technological choices:

- is your choice of activity using a digital tool/s going to help your learners without putting them in danger? (privacy,equity, safety)

- how sustainable is this activity? can you export and keep your content in a useable form? does the authoring tool acknowledge your rights and those of other contributors? (creativity,respect, environmental impact)

Now even these critical choices are more difficult to apply due in part to the ubiquity of so called AI which is often built in by default and the lack of transparency of the algorithms it employs. It is also clear that the Enshittification is well underway - the focus of those companies who had claimed to be offering educational value no longer value learners, but rather prioritise the money and power they now wield. Maybe that was always the case. We are increasingly suffering increased costs (including climatic changes and environmental destruction) as a result of their determination to achieve their techbros dreams. 

I recommend taking a listen to the Marsh family song (inserted below) about Silicon Valley and checking out the William Shockley tale on Wikipedia. 

There are still trustworthy networks out there but they need our support more than ever so don't forget to contribute to keep them alive! Think on about the photo I have used in this post too...

Of genies and bottles...

 

Photo of cartoon in The Guardian November 23rd 2025


    

This time of year it is usual to reflect upon what you have achieved and perhaps set goals for the coming year. I'm going to look somewhat longer term as I feel we are reaching a point of no return and need to urgently address matters which could be catastrophic if they remain below the radar of our societal conscience. 

It is my privilege to continue to work with colleagues from UNICollaboration on virtual exchange and this has kept me researching the use of technical and digital tools for connecting educators and students across continents. I have reflected on my learning openly - as here on my Espace Sisyphe blog - showing my increasing concern about the power and influence of the wealthy controllers of many of our now limited numbers of tech platforms. Where the internet was once a place of lively, largely constructive debate and a source of help and community for many it is increasingly a dangerous, exploitative environment which requires greater skill if you are to avoid being targetted by nefarious forces. I also voluntarily work alongside the most amazing and well informed team of Future Teacher UK  to ensure that the best advice for teachers in terms of equitable access to education is shared openly and without commercial bias. 

So I feel I have been doing what I can post retirement from my position as an onlooker whilst maintaining my open education principles. I feel nonetheless that the sisyphian task is only getting more difficult as AI rapidly infects every aspect of our universe, becoming an existential threat on all that was great about the WWW. I found this interview with Sir Tim Berners-Lee really worth a listen. His belief that things may all work out is tempting but I'm afraid the big money and the greed of the Broligarchy may defeat the higher minded "public good" ethos I embrace and wish to see sustained. I salute him for maintaining dialogue with those who would spoil the internet we loved, he is the better man.

There can be no doubt that the AI race is already exacting huge environmental harms at a time when politicians still fail to enact policies to address global warming and when many world leaders are happy to talk down the risks. With outside interference in elections, democracy itself is under fire. We are standing by and even complicit in the endless exploitation of our planet's resources - that is the water and the air we need to live - so that the super wealthy can fulfil their greedy, selfish desires.  Companies with greater wealth that many nation states push ahead with data centres whilst claiming that AI will save us all - believe me they have no interest in the rest of us!

 So what can I do? 

• Keep calling out the fake and the falsehoods
• Listen to trusted critical thinkers (such as Cory Doctorow, thanks Father Christmas!)
• Resist the hype and mock those who try to fool us
• Make decisions which take power away from the wealthy. 

In the immediate, I am moving more of my reflective writing away from online spaces and back to pens and paper in the coming years. I continue to review critically the use of social media and online platforms to find more ethical spaces. I am not afraid to call out the realities of poor personal security practices online and exclusionary teaching technologies, their impacts are so negative. Please allow time as you reflect to take a deeper, critical dive into the real consequencies of the digital actions and choices you make. It is not easy but you are not alone.

Photo of my copy which came this Christmas

  

On the sustainability of teaching

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Recently I contributed to this final Future teacher 3.0 session by briefly sharing why I work in the open and support open educational practice (OEP) for teachers. I cannot separate that journey from the decision to learn more about ownership of digital learning objects and the use of Creative Commons licences. 
Sustainability is at the heart of that decision. Teaching as a profession is about creating the conditions for learning and growth and currently our wealthy economies are dominated by austerity and the drive to reduce regulation, resulting in open season on working terms and conditions. The gig economy continues to grow  and we will reap the negative effects of the societal impact.

The human cost of forgetting our humanity, our responsibility to one another, in favour of short term rewards is shocking. 

Gert Biesta: Teaching is not an intervention on objects but an encounter between subjects aimed at calling forth the subject-ness of students #CCCUedconf pic.twitter.com/DW9tKQIsC3

— Dr Lee Hazeldine (@CccuEd_blended) 7 February 2019

In my discipline the race to market language learning has decimated a real understanding of the fundamental fact that language is a human act, to improve you need to use it with real humans! 

Extracts from an interview for EFL teachers with Ross Thorburn.
A. What are the biggest changes that you've witnessed in how languages are taught and learned since you started your career in the 1960s? pic.twitter.com/6RHdkFsMI6

— Vivian Cook (@VivCookMC1) 16 February 2019

It may seem dull to learn how to operate and share resources online legally but at the heart of that learning is freedom which is central to the sustainability of teaching. Already inequality of access to language learning is growing, access to learning resources more widely is being limited according to wealth:

In #copyrightreform legislators should care about teachers, not publishing market, which is the “largest cultural industry in Europe”and“shows signs of a new phase of sustainable growth”according to a FEP report from 2017, @AxelVossMdEP, https://t.co/MvZCTg9Nf9 pic.twitter.com/0ewQJcoEUS

— communia (@communia_eu) 14 May 2018

These threats should be resisted by us all, but particularly by teachers. In a typical tongue in cheek tweet, Dave White commented on the difficulty of replicating human interaction through AI:

If only people were computers this would be a whole lot easier... I mean, people - it's almost like they aren't just a stack of maths in some meat.

— David White (@daveowhite) 3 July 2019 

To sustain a good quality of human life we must first value each other, whatever our talents, flaws, differences and challenges and then refuse to support changes which undermine our collective potential to thrive.